nofreelist.com
keyword
 
reviews (a to z)# a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

home :: latest reviews :: reviewer profiles :: statistics :: diary :: links

Boomerang (2002)

  Directed by: Carla Drago
Written by: Teresa O'Sullivan
Starring: Sarah Aubrey, Tom Long
Links: Boomerang on the IMDb
Genre: Short

This movie gets: 3.00 (1 rating)
nofreelist.com Ranking: not yet ranked (awaiting 2 ratings)

"Shitty." - a review by mino

Boomerang is a comedic short film won the 3rd-place prize in the 2002 Tropfest short film festival.

Apparently, 2002 was a very weak year for short films.

I originally thought of describing Boomerang as a one-joke film, but I realise now that this would be unfair. Sure, it only has one joke, but that joke consists of three distinct sub-jokes — so, you know, that's a veritable comedy cornucopia, innit?

The big issue is, Boomerang just isn't funny. The humour is solely scatological, but that's not the problem — believe me, I can be very lowbrow when I need to be. No, the problem is that the poo jokes that form the backbone of Boomerang are simultaneously unfunny, unoriginal, and so mind-bogglingly predictable that I sincerely hope that director Carla Drago's attempts at building to a ‘twist’ ending were intended as a parody, because anyone who doesn't see the ending coming has some pretty severe mental deficiencies that they really oughta get checked out by a qualified professional.

Yawn. Next.

mino gives this movie 3 out of 10.
Review created on Sun 27 Jun 2004

Movie review statistics

Number of reviews: 1
 
Rating Percentage
1 
 0%
2 
 0%
3 
 100%
4 
 0%
5 
 0%
6 
 0%
7 
 0%
8 
 0%
9 
 0%
10 
 0%

Reader comments

  1. I found this one of the most amusing short films I have seen for years! The humour was of course lavatorial, but in using this the Director , Carla Drago, breaks a taboo. I particularly liked the "sting in the tail".

    Rating given: 10

    A comment from Norman Brown on Sun 07 Aug 2005 00:53 #

  2. I have just seen this tonight on SBS just before Iron Chef at 8.30
    I would give it zero out of 10 . Did it have to be THAT realistic in depicting faeces in the toilet, couldn't it have been implied rather than showing it all? I did not realise it was even meant to be a comedy until the bag snatcher put his hand in the bag. The ending was totally unbelievable. The only good thing about the whole miserable effort was when I read the credits ( to see who was responsible) and I found that the long suffering Australian tax-payer did not have to subsidise this piece of mind-numbing piece of garbage.

    Rating given: 1

    A comment from Nick Stefanos on Sat 15 Oct 2005 23:24 #

  3. where can i watch this film online

    A comment from bob on Tue 16 May 2006 11:44 #

Those who have commented give this movie: 5.50 (2 ratings)

Add a comment

Your name:
URL:
Email address:
Make public?
Anti-Spam question:To prove you're not a horrible spam-leaving robot, please answer the following question (use numbers):
If I have 11 Best Achievement in Cinematography Oscars and win 5 more Best Achievement in Cinematography Oscars, how many Best Achievement in Cinematography Oscars do I have?
Comment:
Rate this movie:

You may use the <em>emphasis</em> and <strong>strong emphasis</strong> HTML tags. URLs beginning with ‘http://’ will be turned into links. Line breaks will display as entered.